| Fencing for Dummies Fencing and everything else that interests me. |
NAC in Arlington, Day 1The day started with Division III Women's Saber. The ladies were nervous, as they should have been. Their first NAC in their first competitive season, all kinds of reason to be nervous. I don't in any fault them for it, if anything most of the blame lays on me. I've never been strong with readying students for competition. Mostly because since I was 9 I've been competing in some sport or another. The physical tension, the mental alertness and the emotional calm this creates in me is nearly a natural state for me. Once the fencing started though, both Robyn and Marilyn visibly calmed and relaxed. I was quite pleased by their level of intensity and determination. Neither gave up and fought hard for each touch. Both had very difficult pools. One of the girls in Marilyn's pool was the Silver medalist, 3 in Robyn's pool made the Final 8, including the Gold medalist. The triumph of the day was Marilyn's comment after the pool round that it felt just like fencing in Illinois. Huzzah!! It's all fencing. No matter where, when, or against whom; it's all fencing. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/09/2004 01:08:00 PM ----- BODY: It's official! The US Men's Saber team has locked a spot to Athens! -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/08/2004 11:42:00 AM ----- BODY: A new blog that should be of interest to my journalist friends: Oh, That Liberal Media. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/05/2004 09:43:00 AM ----- BODY: Conrad offers a round-up of some of the latest pro-war/anti-war Kerry explanations.Kerry's claim is, however, is even more untenable than the long dead Mr. Hallow's. Kerry asserts that his own private and undisclosed misinterpretatation of Bush's unequivocal -- indeed, expressly opposite -- statements, amounts to a misrepresentation by Bush. Kerry's real complaint is that he wilfully chose not believe that Bush meant what he said -- despite Bush's repeated insistance that that was precisely what he meant and -- dammit ole W was telling the truth. Kerry is trying to blame Bush for not being as feckless as he is.Yeah, you know what to do. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/04/2004 01:52:00 PM ----- BODY: The Professor identifies something Kerry is standing firm on (for now). -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/03/2004 10:35:00 AM ----- BODY: As someone interested in scientific research and how that research translates into public policy, this article contains some good examples. As part of its accusation that the Bush administration suppressed scientific research and information, the UCS cites Nixon-era EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus as saying that it’s not legitimate to withhold a scientific analysis just because you don’t like the outcome. Ruckelshaus, of course, had a special talent for dealing with scientific analysis he didn’t like ? he just ignored it. At the conclusion of the 1971-1972 EPA hearings on whether the insecticide DDT should be banned, the EPA judge concluded that DDT was not a threat to human health or to the environment. Then-EPA Administrator Ruckelshaus banned DDT anyway. But Ruckelshaus never attended the hearings, didn’t read the transcript and refused to release the materials used to make his decision. He even rebuffed a U.S. Department of Agriculture effort to obtain those materials through the Freedom of Information Act, claiming they were just “internal memos.” This wasn’t surprising given Ruckelshaus’ bias. As it turns out, he was a closet environmentalist who personally raised money for the Environmental Defense Fund, an activist group that led the charge to ban DDT.As they say, read it all. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/01/2004 02:56:00 PM ----- BODY: And most likely the Men's Foil team as well! This is unheard of. Now is great time to be in this sport! -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/01/2004 02:52:00 PM ----- BODY: Congratulations to the US Men's Saber Team for their qualification to the Athens' Olympics! -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/29/2004 09:29:00 PM ----- BODY: Am I a member of a cult? No, I didn't think so either. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/27/2004 10:00:00 PM ----- BODY: On the way home from practice tonight, I was standing on the Blue Line platform waiting for the train; a guy standing next to me was shouting on his cellphone about making money and having stuff. What stuck was something along the lines of "when I get a taste of something I like, I want more...I'm hungry, and I'll stay hungry." It didn't explicitly occur to me until I'd gotten off the train that that is the hunger of a competitor. Just getting to the top (or achieving a goal or two) is no reason to slack and not stay on top of your game. There's always someone below you wanting your spot. Thus, a change in the way I approach practice. Starting with tomorrow's. A word for everyone standing in line with a shinier medal: I want, and will have, your spot. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/26/2004 09:12:00 AM ----- BODY: The lead-in link advertised a list of the "Ten Richest Presidents". The article, however spends only a couple of graphs actually discussing the Top 5 Richest Presidents. Forbes.com: Kerry Would Be Third-Richest U.S. President I'm not entirely sure what to think, but I'm not sure I would hold it as any sort of good reporting. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/24/2004 12:49:00 PM ----- BODY: Picked up the 2003 Men's Saber World Championship video from Fencing.net. The video quality itself is nothing special. The occasional tight focus that leaves out a piece of the action, one angle slightly off to the side. While those are liveable, the real 'What?!' moment is starting the video of the Team Gold Medal match at 23-22. There's also only one semifinal bout. Now to the fencing: Wow The video clearly shows something that beginners never believe (nor most fencers until they get to higher levels of fencing), fencing is a simple game. Touches are scored with tight distance and unbelieveable tempo control. Not crazy, unbelieveable actions. There are no counter-counter-counter ripostes. Very few, if any, pris de fer actions. I recommend the video as an example of what World-class fencing looks like and as a standard to aspire towards. I know it's helped me tighten some of my tactics after just a couple of viewings. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/24/2004 11:25:00 AM ----- BODY: A bit unexpected, but there it is.
Illinois OpenSaturday's tournament produced mixed feelings for me. I started the day on a high note, and fell short at the end. Not of expectations, however. My expectations started rather low. (I had practiced the night before the competition. That's something I never do, but because of a lack of practice in the past couple of months I figured I could use the work-out. I fenced poorly at practice, borderline lousy. That had me worried about my performance on Saturday morning) After winning my first two pool bouts rather handily, the 2nd against one of the Bs entered into the competition, I was in competitive form. Despite the relatively low indicator, I was quite satisfied with my pool line score going 5-1 with a +8. Enough for 5th out of the pools and a bye into the round of 16. The DE round, however, not so good. My first bout was frustrating for a myriad of reasons. The first being that not only could the ref not see tempo (something that if I know, I can adjust to), she wasn't calling action. Just putting her hands up to announce touches. Well, great. How can I adjust if I have no idea what to adjust to? Also, I noticed her after a particuarly hard/fast/tight action looking at one of the fencers from the host club as if he was going to make the call for her. (I was very close to voicing that as a question to her.) My response to this? To ride every close call, claim every possible touch and express my disappointment with every touch not called my way (that was possibly mine). Why? 1. I'm really not a nice guy, when I'm fencing. 2. In fencing, ESPECIALLY in saber, anytime a referee shows even a hint of weakness, they will be destroyed. By the fencers, the coaches, the spectators (by example both my coach a few people watching the bout on my side were getting on her for at least 5 bad calls). This is what fencers are trained to do, exploit weaknesses. 3. I wasn't asking her to change her call, and if she had, even in my favor, the bout committee would have been called immediately. If not by my opponent, then by myself. Such indecision has no place at a major open competition (this was a Heartland Circuit event). What I was doing, by claiming every possible touch that wasn't mine was trying to get the referee to consider the action the next time. That's really what all the screaming and gesturing is about: the time that happens. Suffice to say, I won the bout, narrowly at 15-13, and for the last touch decided that I wasn't going to let the ref make a call. Stepped forward, closed my opponent out and tapped him on the sholder. The next round was rather subdued (it helps when you have an opponent who fences with class and a ref you respect), however disappointing for me. At 14-11 I tried to come up with that one action that had been consistently working instead of fencing. I didn't find one and lost 15-14. Thus the danger of trying to force an action instead of letting the phrase develop under your guidance. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/10/2004 12:37:00 PM ----- BODY: Why is it that this article runs in a British newspaper and not an American one? Wouldn't have anything to do with the sensitivity or bias of newspaper editors, would it? Kerry won't scare any of the big beasts -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/04/2004 12:00:00 PM ----- BODY: Have you ever seen some dumb-ass smoking in a No Smoking Area (or even better, in front of the sign) and wanted to walk over and strangle the frickin' life out of 'em? No? Oh, I guess it's just me then. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 2/03/2004 01:59:00 PM ----- BODY: Since most of my visitors come looking for a book on fencing (mostly a simple one like the popular "Dummies" series), here is a list of current fencing books. I have not read most of them, so I can not comment on their simplicity or clarity. However, if anyone is at all interested in coaching, "Fencing and the Master" is a must-have. I recommend buying anything by Nick Evangelista and then promptly burning it. No, don't read it. Don't pass it on. Nor should you toss it out, only to be found by a neighbor. Promptly remove it from circulation and existence. One book not on that list, but one that definitely deserves to be there is Preparing the Mind by Aladar Kogler. A sport-psychology must-have. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 1/29/2004 12:48:00 PM ----- BODY: On sunday at Northwestern a referee standing behind me said "Halt!" Short pause as he looked at the fencer touched and then said (and I couldn't make this up if I dared): "Same mistake. Touch left." Same mistake? WTF!? As a fencer I'd be asking what that mistake was. Apparently the fencer touched either knew (and understood the call), or didn't bother to ask because the fencers were immediately called to guard and told to fence with no questions or complaints. This is, sadly, far too frequent. Well, not that specific language, but language of the same vein. Incorrect, leading, demeaning, or otherwise unprofessional language. The most commonly misused "term" (although it appears in no fencing text I've ever seen, most specifically the Rules Book) is "mal parrie" - 'bad parry'. What's wrong with that? Well, the referees job is not to tell a fencer what they did wrong. He is there to adjudicate the action. He describes the action, not trying to read into the fencer's intentions. Saying "mal parrie" (and it's always said with a bit of a faux accent) declares that the fencer intended to parry the attack. Why are we making that assumption? That doesn't help the fencers, it doesn't make anything clearer to them while describing the action. Simply say "attack [arrives/suceeds/lands/whatever]." That's clear and precise. Fencer X makes attack, it lands. We don't care what fencer Y tried to do, it didn't effect the result of X's attack. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 1/25/2004 11:42:00 PM ----- BODY: Spent the weekend refereeing at a Dual-Meet at Northwestern University. First off, those are LONG. 10 Schools, 3 person teams for each weapon. Every team member fences every team member on the opposing side equaling 9 5-touch bouts. So what, right? 9 5-touch bouts? That's a pool of 5. Pfffft. Weeellllll, one of those is easy, 2 or 3 still easy. 9 without any sort of meaningful break. That's rough on the feet. This wasn't my first time ref'ing a dual-meet (I'm guessing the reason for the name is that both the men's and women's teams competed, women on Saturday, men on Sunday). It was however, my first time at this level of intensity. The previous collegiate tournaments had been long and rough, but never at this weekend's constant fencing. As soon as one round ended, the next would begin. And today, I was often enough one of last refs done my match. Which annoyed the hell out of me. Foil. Sunday was men's foil. How is it that 2 men's foil fencers have a hard time scoring 5 touches in 3 minutes? (And I'm talking COMBINED score here) As a fencer, I'm all for setting up actions, taking time on the strip, maneuvering for position and waiting for the perfect timing. No problem there because that is an integral part of the game. What got me about A LOT of what I saw today was two fencers engaging, waving their blades about, moving their feet for no reason at all, and then when no touch was scored (as was often the case), they'd retreat and repeat. I had at least 5 bouts go to time today, and 2 go into the sudden death overtime. One of which was the last bout of the day. Also, while watching the fencing, several times I saw ways to beat, nay destroy, several of the fencers and their opponents usually completely missed them. Totally. I also have to mention the annoying and persistent misuse of the Time-Out. In Collegiate fencing (and most HS leagues as well) each team is allowed one 30 second time-out per bout. Let me reiterate that: Each TEAM is allowed one (1!) 30 second time-out per BOUT. Now, as a general guideline, I don't oppose having a time-out. There have been PLENTY of times in my short coaching career when I'd have liked 30 seconds to talk with a fencer and help them figure out what's going on. Over the past weekend I saw coaches that would call for a time-out when the score reached 3 touches against (regardless of their fencers performance). AND many times one fencer would reach 3 touches, the other coach (or team captain) would ask for a T-O. Then, after some coaching and execution, the score would be tied and the other coach would ask for a T-O. ARGH! Let the kids fence!! Ah, but I continue (the over coaching comment is a rant all it's own that I'll come back to, someday). I had one coach ask for a time-out when his fencer was up 4-2. WTF? Add to that one little detail that only I was aware of at the time: there was 1 second left on the clock. Yeah, that was aggravating. But, it wasn't all annoyance. There were plenty of decent, and a couple of very enjoyable fencers in the room (one being from the University of Florida, who started the day with 6 cups of coffee). I needed the practice. I hadn't ref'd since the last dual-meet at Northwestern in mid-November, and after the first 6 bouts Saturday morning, it was quite evident that I needed to shake off the dust a both more regularly if I'm to continue ref'ing at a high (relatively speaking) level. The 18 hours spent this weekend not only dusted me off, but at the end drained the everything out. Good though. Good to get back to fencing and refereeing. A little comment about the weirdness of the dual-meet format. When one says "tournament" invariably a grand conflict where no one leaves until only one is standing comes to mind. So, when I'm asked "hey, want to ref at a Northwestern tournament on weekend X?" I think of a bunch of teams getting together fencing hard and one of them coming out on top of the pile (like at a USFA team event). Heh, this is college fencing... As I understand it, each 'match' is a separate 'game' and each win counts separately for season totals. Which would explain how Laurie Schiller became the winningest coach ever at Northwestern with over 800 victories. O, and to achieve a "victory" in a match, all the bout wins are totaled for the 3 weapons (best-of-27). -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 1/15/2004 10:50:00 AM ----- BODY: Ugh... I have not trained in nearly 6 weeks. Training resumes on Saturday. The IL Open at CAAFA is the first week of February, and the Div II/III NAC in Arlington is only 2 months from now. Whew...Unfortunately, I can't 'make-up' for lost time, but I can pour myself into the Salle and make every minute count. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 1/15/2004 10:46:00 AM ----- BODY: I am known as "Karol", during classtime anyway. Apparently it is tradition to adopt a "Polish name" for the class, and because there is no "Clinton" in Polish I got to have one picked for me... The first time the professor called on me, I had no idea who she was talking to...heh I was encouraged by the class, we covered lots by at a reasonable, non-overwhelming pace. Apparently I was not the only one put-off by the first class, as two students didn't show up who had been there on monday. Class next wednesday, plenty of time to study and do all the extra homework assigned. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 1/13/2004 10:01:00 AM ----- BODY: Last night's class was...rough. I didn't expect it to be an easy language going in, but the presentation of the material was...confusing at best. Lots of phrases in a very short time without any particular focus on the words and their meanings. Perhaps the lesson was to focus on pronunciation, however the sheer amount of material detracted from that, for me anyway. Hopefully in the next couple of weeks, the presentation of material becomes clearer (and cleaner). -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 1/08/2004 03:57:00 PM ----- BODY: I'm now officially a part-time student at Wright College. I'll be starting with one class - Polish 101. I'm not expecting it to be at all easy, but I am expecting it to be fun. I'll have ample practice opportunity, training at a club where regularly I am the only one in the room who doesn't speak the language. Unfortunately, the class is on Mondays and Wednesdays. The cuts my coaching in about half, and takes away all my foil instructing (although, I was starting to run out of new things to teach to the intermediate class I doubt they would have balked at review of nearly everything in a more movement oriented fashion). -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 1/07/2004 11:17:00 AM ----- BODY: Are you still eating beef? I am. Yes, even with all the recent hysteria, Mad Cow disease (or BSE to you science types) is a minor risk. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 12/22/2003 04:49:00 PM ----- BODY: Here's a little note for the Holidays. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 12/17/2003 12:44:00 AM ----- BODY: Orson Scott Card speaks again. I am reminded how cool Ender's Game is, perhaps I'll pick up the series after the holidays. On a related note, earlier this evening I caught a Dennis Miller show on HBO2 from last February. At more than one point he slammed the Left hard and praised the president as someone who 'makes me respect the presidency again' (or something to that effect). The crowd gave him a rousing applause. I was surprised, even more so when I discovered that the show was taped at the Chicago Theater. I never would have guessed a Chicago audience applauding to such comments. To quote a well-known professor, "Heh." -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 12/11/2003 12:06:00 PM ----- BODY: Donald Sensing is a man who knows good coffee (I've heard that he also knows other things, but haven't read enough to make a statement on that). -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 12/10/2003 06:29:00 PM ----- BODY: Here's something about the Anti-Terror protests in Baghdad. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 12/10/2003 12:35:00 PM ----- BODY: To continue the theme from earlier today, here's a commentary on Gore's flip-flop. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 12/10/2003 09:27:00 AM ----- BODY: Politicians? Omitting Facts? But notice, they only do it "Sometimes". Hmmmmm..... -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/26/2003 01:34:00 PM ----- BODY: Big changes by the USFA Board of Directors to the Qualifying Paths for National Championships. 2003-04 Qualification Paths to National Events I certainly agree that changes were needed (otherwise we'd have 500 or more people in Division 3 events), and now the tournaments will be more like a National Championship than a NAC. Here are the 2 most impacting changes: Division 2: 1. Place in the top 25% (with a minimum of 3) of the 2004 Division II Qualifying competition Examples: 1 entry = 1 qualifier 2 entries = 2 qualifiers 3-12 entries = 3 qualifiers 13-16 entries = 4 qualifiers 17-20 entries = 5 qualifiers etc. 2. Qualifiers for the 2004 Division I-A National Championships in that weapon 3. Qualifiers for the 2004 Under-19 National Championships in that weapon 4. Qualifiers for the 2004 Under-16 National Championships in that weapon 5. Placed in the top 4 at the 2003 Division III National Championships Division 3: 1. Place in the top 25% (with a minimum of 3) among the total number of "D", "E", or "U" fencers competing in the 2004 Division II Qualifying competition Examples: 1 eligible entry = 1 qualifier 2 eligible entries = 2 qualifiers 3-12 eligible entries = 3 qualifiers 13-16 eligible entries = 4 qualifiers 17-20 eligible entries = 5 qualifiers etc. 2. Qualifiers for 2004 Division II National Championships -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/26/2003 12:37:00 PM ----- BODY: The IFC Open on November 9th was quite a sucess. I finished 2nd, reearning a D03. Looking back over the log sheets I am pleased with how I scored touches, not so pleased with how touches were scored upon me, but I know I have a ways to go still. I suceeded in winning over half of the pool bouts, but did not score more than 3 touches in each bout. The Direct Elimination rounds: I have one of my DE bouts on video and looking it over I am reminded of my self-talk during the bout. At 6-9 I realized I wasn't fencing, more looking for the quick, one light touch the ref couldn't miss. Once I got back to fencing, the score was 10-9. Then 12-10. At 12-12 I decided that I'd had enough. Two quick touches made it 14-12 and after a couple of simultaneous actions, an aborted attack (because my opponent claimed he didn't hear the 'fence'), the bout ended. My last bout for the gold was a disaster, an opponent who was more interested in running me over, a ref who appeared to only be halfway interested in the bout and myself, most of all, who stopped fencing shortly after the start of the bout. The Turkey Shoot at Catholic Memorial HS in Wisconsin was a lot of fun. I started by ref'ing some of the mixed foil (for a free entry, not going to turn that down). Fencing started late (no surprise there), and by the time it did start I was already cooled down. Because of that I got off to a slow start in my first bout. Falling behind by a touch, I also felt like my attacks were just a tiny bit behind my opponent (the one B in the event). I managed to mix up my actions well and finished the bout with a 5-2 win. The rest of the pool was relatively easy EXCEPT for one bout. I fell behind 4-2, and thought that I'd better tighten my steps, because I was still hunting for the elusive 'at least 3 touches in every bout'. I ended that bout with a 4-5 loss, but felt good about it because my distance and timing were good. With the start of the DEs, my first draw was against a girl from my pool, who I ruthlessly cut down 15-1. My next bout was against fellow car rider Paul (who, btw, is a playa... heh). He jumped out to a quick 6-2 lead. Again I realized that I had stopped fencing and was looking for the quick, easy touch. I managed to turn that one around and pull out an 7-8 score at the break and win 15-10. My semi-final bout was against a fencer from Minnesota who has been an acquaintance for quite some time. That was one of my most enjoyable bouts in ages. We fenced hard for every touch, but congratulated each other on most of them (as well as helped each other explain the refs calls...). In the end, he prevailed 15-13. A tie for 3rd was good enough for me, as a medal satisfied my placement goal at a largely unknown field. The real highlight of the day was winning the turkey raffle for my event. Looking at the IL schedule, I've got a while before the next tournament, as most places tend to defer to the National schedule and that's pretty busy in the next few weeks. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/26/2003 12:29:00 PM ----- BODY: The educational quagmire continues. in today's NY Times:Cheating was not often discussed here until last spring, when two incidents forced Westport to confront a problem that exists all over the country and is growing worse every year. First, the school newspaper ran a student essay denouncing "epidemic cheating." "It's part of the routine," the essay said. "Wake up, come to school, cheat." A day later, two students were caught cheating on an Advanced Placement history exam, one by opening the test booklet early and the other by peeking at a neighbor's work. [...] At first, parents and teachers doubted the extent of the problem, Dr. Brady said. But he is chipping away at that resistance, with help from the students who have joined him at PTA and faculty meetings to explain how it all works: calculators loaded with computerized study guides like CliffsNotes, electronic messages exchanged between students taking the same exam during different periods, and physics homework parceled out between friends. [...] There is ample statistical evidence of the explosion of cheating in high school. Michael S. Josephson, who runs an ethics institute in Los Angeles, found in 2002 that 74 percent of 10,000 high school students surveyed nationwide had cheated on a test in the previous 12 months, up from 61 percent 10 years earlier. Donald McCabe, a Rutgers University professor, published similar findings in 2001: of 4,500 high school students, 75 percent had cheated at least once on a test, up from 50 percent in 1993 and 25 percent in 1963.And my favorite parts: Mr. Josephson, who said high-end schools generally turn a blind eye to cheating, agreed. "I don't think this is a generation of moral mutants," he said. "What's changed is parenting. If you catch their kid cheating they threaten a lawsuit." [...] The response from teachers, Dr. Brady said, has been more lethargic, and he is not sure why. But there are some encouraging developments. One sophomore English teacher recently assigned Ethan Canin's short story "The Palace Thief," the basis for the movie "The Emperor's Club," which deals with cheating. The math teachers met last week to discuss the possibility of having a set of classroom calculators, so students cannot load them with inappropriate software. Many teachers have stopped giving the same tests in different periods.Teachers caring about students learning? The horror! And this in one of the nation's top HS. (If you happen to notice any disconnect between this post and one a few down, well, I'll leave that to you to figure out.) -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/25/2003 01:05:00 PM ----- BODY: Ender's Game author Orson Scott Card shares a few thoughts on lying. Speaking of lies, the next person who wants to rave, or in any way praise Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine gets this link. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/20/2003 02:51:00 PM ----- BODY: FOXNews.com - Views - CATO - Is It Time For a New New Deal? Yes, I realize there's a lack of fencing-related posts on what is, ostensibly, a fencing blog. I'll be posting wrap-ups very soon. Also, an outlook for the next compeition in Wisconsin this weekend. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/13/2003 03:56:00 PM ----- BODY: The world needs more politicians like this guy. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/13/2003 01:31:00 PM ----- BODY: Someone needs to remind me, yet again, why I should read the New York Times. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/13/2003 01:30:00 PM ----- BODY: The educational quagmire deepens: School suspends teen for rap lyric -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/11/2003 10:03:00 PM ----- BODY: Cox & Forkum's tribute to veterans everywhere. Veterans Day -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 11/04/2003 06:48:00 PM ----- BODY: This makes sense to me, but I'm from a family that harvested timber (and fought fires on the town Fire Department). -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 10/29/2003 01:51:00 PM ----- BODY: The Remenyik was a real treat for Foil and Men's Saber fencers. Ann Marsh (2-time Olympian WF team member, WF team Bronze medal at the World Champs in 2000) fenced and won both the Men's Foil and Women's Foil. Mike Momtselidze fenced (and won) the Men's Saber competition. As a spectator it was a tremedous treat to see these highly rated fencers at an event in my backyard. I have to say that I didn't see either of them doing anything that most other fencers were doing, just tremedously better. Also, it was very exciting to see a short, left-handed fencer (Momtselidze is not much, if at all, taller than myself) beat fencers eight or more inches taller than him. One of my great difficulties is fencing considerably taller fencers. Now I have an idea of how to focus on my training against taller fencers. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 10/29/2003 01:35:00 PM ----- BODY: Wow, where do the days go? How did I fare at the Burton and were my goals optimistic? I finished 4th (well within the Top 50% as there were 24 entries), earning a D03 (Not even remotely in my goals at this time). In the pools I went 4-1, again satisfying another goal. However, in the one bout I lost I only scored 2 touches. Falling just short of satisfying all my performance goals. My attacks were good, scoring most of my touches. My defense was weak, having most of my touches scored against me while I was on defense. Counter-offense was not so strong either, particularly in the realm of Counter-time. The one bout I lost, my opponent scored at least 3 of his touches using counterattacks. Not good there. This gave me things to focus on in my training. In the Direct Elimination rounds, I fenced two people from my pool, both also left-handed. The first was a relatively easy bout, I managed to get the counter-time game going adding a few touches with that in addition to my attacks. The next bout was against the one fencer in the pool who defeated me. I was definitely 'up' for this bout. We were quite tight to 8-7, him. I was surprised by the lack of counterattacks, his majorly successful move in the pool bout. I do remember at one point looking at the scoreboard and noticing the score being 13-8, me. I thought, "Wow, I've just scored 6 unanswered touches." Mistake! Suddenly the score was 13-11, then 14-13. At 13-11, I realized that I stopped attacking, stopped pressing, and let up. This allowed him to force me into making mistakes on defense. Once I turned it around, the bout was mine once again. Lesson re-learned: Never let up, the cushion goes away. This is something I learned in my 2nd competitive season. Just shows that some time away from competition requires a few bouts to reset the mental game. Many times I would press stronger fencers and get up 4-1/4-2 and then relax because I had a lead and lose the bout 4-5 (That's why they were the stronger fencers, they never let up, especially when behind). My semi-final bout against one of the Northwestern fencers was ugly. My hand stopped moving, letting my feet do all the work, which resulted in many Attacks in Preparation for my opponent. When my hand did move, it led my feet by a step or more, also resulting in many counterattacks/stop cuts/Attacks in Prep for my opponent. I'm still not sure how I managed to score 6 touches. Because Northwestern only gives out 3 trophies/medals, there was a Bronze medal bout. It was against Oleg Movachev. A smoother, cleaner, more poised fencer I have not faced. He was a combination of experience and control. My tournament wrap-up sheets ask the question "How they hit you:" My answer: "How ever he wanted." I'm still quite surprised that I scored 6 touches...heh (And partially convinced that after leading 8-1, he relaxed to make it a 'fairer' bout.) Overall, I'm quite pleased with my results and look forward to the IFC Open on November 9th. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 10/10/2003 07:37:00 PM ----- BODY: Burton Open at Northwestern tomorrow. I fence at 3pm (or so, strips available). Everything's set: uniform is washed, competition notebook is together and labeled. The only thing that concerns me is my current activity cycle. Not working this week (ah, the joys of a temp worker), coupled with an irregular sleep cycle has thrown my training regimen off. Neither tuesday nor thursday were particularly good fencing nights for me, especially in the area of movement (both my feet and the blade). Well, at this point the only thing I can do is go and fence hard. Fight for every touch, and keep both my feet and my hands in motion (preferrably the correct motion corresponding to my feet). Focus on what's happening and adjust. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 10/01/2003 11:01:00 PM ----- BODY: The trailer for Return of the King is out. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/30/2003 10:29:00 PM ----- BODY: A little less than two weeks before the Burton Open and it's time to make some specific goals. I will finish in the top half. This is my first event in nearly a year, and I have no idea what the field will be like. To finish in the top half, I will half to win at least half of my pool bouts and score at least 3 touches in the other ones. That would put me in the middle of the pack for the DE rounds. I suspect that I'll have to win 2 DE bouts against fencers finishing near me to set myself in the top half of the field. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/25/2003 09:53:00 AM ----- BODY: What can I say about the Junior Fencing Festival? First, the clinic with Maestro Richards was excellent (at least the first day, I didn't attend day 2). Great fun was had by most (I think some of the younger fencers didn't get as much out of it as they could have, which is a shame). For me, it was mostly refreshing as I haven't been to coaches college in a couple of years. I'd seen most of the drills we did before, particularly a couple of the distance games. However, I don't remember hearing the dirty little secrets of doing them correctly. Changing the mechanics of my attacks will be a tough habit to break, that's for sure. I did notice at practice on Tuesday that when I did them correctly, I was unstoppable. Doing them correctly stood at about 50/50. The tournament on Sunday was unexpectedly large. We prepared 5 strips (only 2 saber-capable), with the turnout we culd have used as many as 8. This is a good moment for a note about pre-registration: it is always preferable to use pre-registration if it is offered. If not, at least send the tournament director (or contact of the host club) an email (or call them) and tell them you are coming (how many, what weapons, respective ratings, etc). That way the organizers have a rough idea of how many people to plan for. As of Saturday, there was no event with more than 10 people entered. You can then imagine our surprise that 15 people showed up for the Youth Mixed Saber. All-in-all the event ran smoothly with the last touch being scored at 4:15. That, my friends, is an early day. My favorite part? I got to sit around all day and answer questions from concerned parents (usually by directing them to Diana...heh). Because of the involvement of host club members, coaches, and parents I'm looking forward to how next year's pans out. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/17/2003 02:49:00 PM ----- BODY: Yet more reasons to avoid the teaching profession: This isn't overly surprising. BUT this one is. Last month, the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation (search) released a book titled, "Where Did Social Studies Go Wrong?," which lambasted the way social studies are taught in America's schools. The volume criticizes university professors who steer future teachers in too liberal a direction. It attacks weak civics curricula and a misplaced focus on multiculturalism, and expresses particular indignation about the way the Sept. 11 attacks were handled by educators. “At the very time we most need our citizens and future citizens to learn what it means to be American and why America is worth defending ... the part of the school curriculum on which we must rely for help has turned into a hindrance. It’s not getting the job done. It’s wrongheaded. It may even be making matters worse," reads the book's introduction, written by Chester E. Finn, Jr., president of the Fordham Foundation. "The keys to Rome are being turned over to the Goths and Huns," Finn wrote.Which, in the current educational/PC environment is quite a damning sentiment. Notice, however the response from the educators: “We do not see ourselves as lunatics, Huns or Goths,” said Rick Theisen, former president of the National Council for the Social Studies (search) and a veteran teacher. Theisen said that while the language of the Fordham report is objectionable and does little to further a dialogue on the improvement of social studies, the teaching of history and civics could be bolstered in a number of ways. For instance, as a result of the No Child Left Behind Act (search), which places an emphasis on reading and math and imposes serious consequences on schools that fail to educate students in those subjects, social studies gets short shrift. “If it’s not tested, it’s not taught,” Theisen said, adding that if NCLB is not modified, “it will do more [to harm the teaching] of social studies than virtually any other movement." Theisen also said publishers can also do more to increase student interest in the topic. “Most textbooks are almost universally bland and uninspiring,” he said.Ah...Passing the buck (actually what he's doing is tearing it in half and passing it to different people) once again. One of the things my HS teachers did to spice up the textbooks was to require book reports. We could choose a book, fiction or non- that discussed the time period/events we were discussing in class during the quarter. Notice also the amount of legislation mentioned in that short article. The current political environment makes considering teaching as a possible career choice, oh, impossible. Add this brief reading with an article I read a few years ago about the change in the teaching curriculum at colleges (Teachers were becoming counselors and babysitters, moving away from educators. I guess this is what's meant by 'Progressive Education'.), and an aunt of mine (who taught for 20+ years) telling me to stay away ('Why do you think I retired at a relatively early age?' was about her sentiment, she has 3 children and went back to teaching after each one). As much as I enjoy teaching fencing, I think teaching is a logical extension, but as it stands now it's impossible for me to consider. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/16/2003 01:26:00 PM ----- BODY: Upcoming EventsThis weekend marks the 2nd Annual Chicago Junior Fencing Festival (CJFF). Hosted by CFC, I wasn't involved with the event last year. My involvement this year is still a bit uncertain, I imagine I'll be refereeing and doing a little bit Bout Committee stuff. My expectations for this event are quite low, considering that I've seen what passes for Junior fencing in the division. October 11th - Burton Open at Northwestern. I'll be competing in said event. Registration for Men's Saber closes at 2:45. Now that's a proper Saber event. None of this early morning stuff, that's for Foil fencers. (Although I fully expect to be there most of the day coaching some of those silly foilists.) I have no plans to fence in the Remenyik (see above comment on time). I do hope to ref that event, as the Illinois Division pays well, generally speaking, and the fencing is quite good. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/12/2003 04:24:00 PM ----- BODY: Last night's Chicago Highlife adventure was...Fencing with CFC. About 20 people showed up, we went through the normal warm-up, stretch, light footwork, then spent 20 minutes getting them suited up. That left about 10 minutes for the actual fencing part. The fencing part, not real sucessful in my opinion. Sure, there were a few people who interested (or seemingly so) in "getting it right" rather than just swinging their foils around. However, the entire group reminded me of teaching a middle school class. Sure, it gave the club more exposure and a little bit of extra income, but extra students? Doubtful, at best. I have long struggled with a good "demonstration" model. At some level, showing people what good (or at least decent D/C level) fencing looks like is important (in the context of an hour or so demonstration) to dispell any notions of "movie fencing". However, I'm also a big fan of doing instead of sitting around and watching or talking, especially when it comes to a physical activity like fencing, so at some point there should be a bit of audience participation (which could limit the size of the audience, possibly limiting the effectiveness of the demonstration). What's a good solution? I'm not sure, currently, that there is one that does not take the age/maturity/size of the group into consideration. Perhaps the best solution is to consider the alternatives and treat each group that wants a demo seperately based on that group. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/11/2003 01:28:00 PM ----- BODY: 8 students started the latest beginner's class at CFC last night. Very exciting! I haven't had a class of that size in a couple of years, and I'm still working on the "getting around to everyone" aspect of teaching large groups. My strength in coaching is in an individual lesson. So, even with a TA (because I'm planning on taking a Monday & Wednesday course next spring) this session will be a learning experience for all of us. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/11/2003 11:08:00 AM ----- BODY:9/11Still wondering what the fuss is all about 2 years later? Stephen Green offers some insight. Update And .this is a must as well. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 9/10/2003 10:34:00 AM ----- BODY:A New SeasonLast night started my training for this season. After a couple months away from serious training it was good to go back. I must say that I'm excited because this will be the first season in many that I've been able to train as much, if not more, than I'll be coaching. This will further my competitive ambitions for the next few years. A couple of preliminary goals for the season are: to finish in the Top 50% of all competitions entered; and medal in at least half of those. How many competitions will I be fencing in? Looking quickly over the IL schedule I see 4 that I'll get to, possibly 1 or 2 in Indiana and maybe a couple in Wisconsin. I usually try to avoid vague technical goals like "improve hand speed". As an improvement in hand speed is a result of control, relaxation and strength. As for training itself I know I have weaknesses and through lessons, drilling and focused bouting I can strengthen those areas. Simply making a statement like "I want to improve X," doesn't give me any benchmarks for improvement. Now if I were to say I want to improve my lunging/reaction time (as measured by a Target Speed target system) to Y time. That is a more appropriate statement for improvement. Of course, once that time is reached, we can set yet another time for ourselves and measure our incremental gains. I expect that once I begin training regularly my goals and focus will change and expand. I like what Christine did here, however because of my lack of serious training in the past few years and inexperience with the compeitive field in the Illinois division I'm not sure what's appropriate. I suspect I'll find out after my fist compeition or two. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 7/13/2003 08:23:00 PM ----- BODY: Today I visited the Adler Planetarium for the first time. Watched one of their shows as well as wandered around the museum portion. The show was partially interactive as the audience chairs are equipped with little directional arrows. You're asked a couple of questions you can use the arrows to answer and then the audience (as a collective) gets to pilot a little craft around looking for things. The lesson learned today was most people will drive the craft straight into the side of canyons... Obviously not enough former Nintendo players in the audience for my particular show. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 7/13/2003 08:12:00 PM ----- BODY: I'm taking the month of July off to enjoy the city, cross-train and improve my overall health. This is a completely new experience to me, since 1997 I have fenced year-round with many months of coaching involved there. I'm also recovering from a sinus congestion caused by the air conditioning and pollen-filled swimming pool in Austin. I think it might be a low-level infection of some sort, but I've been steadly improving, so I'm hoping for the best. I'll be seeing all my fencing buddies (and students) in August. Also in August, I'll be having a guest from the Czech Republic visiting for two weeks, and she fences Epee, she's looking forward to fencing with all of us. Have a good July. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 7/13/2003 07:51:00 PM ----- BODY:Summer NationalsWhile my plan of daily (or at least regular updates) was dashed upon the rocks of exhaustion at the end of each day, here are a few of my thoughts from the event. Day 1 - Started the day with Y-12 Boy's Saber. Normally, this would be a fairly easy event to referee. Young boys, most not fencing long, most not sure what they're doing with the weapon in their hands, almost all doing what they can and letting the referee sort it out in the end. While the fencing may not be clean and easy to decipher, the kids are willing to go with the calls. The coaches however, need to chill. At 12 years old, many coaches have decided who is the future of fencing and who is more suited for another sport. This leads to lots of screaming and "advocating" for the kids. Just sit down and let the kids play the game. Screaming at both the fencer and ref doesn't do anyone any good. But it puts on a good show for the parents and shows them that the coach cares. Later in the day I was switched to Division 3 Men's Foil. Oi! Someone in the bout committee hates me. However because there were over 300 entries and just under 300 competitors, most of the refs got a pool of Div3 MF. My prediction: the qualifying paths will change to allow the top 30% at the Division Qualifiers to Div II, top 60% (or maaaaybe 75%) to Div III. This was an idea that was floated around as soon as the event began and the numbers became widespread knowledge. After my pool there, I was sure I was going to get stuck in the DEs and have a long night. I was only half right... I was switched to Div III Women's Epee Direct Elimination rounds. I was handed 1/8 of a table of 256 and told to come back when there was only person standing (whether or not that I was still standing wasn't made clear). After what seemed to be HOURS later, I was given a round of 8 bout and told that I'd be doing the Gold Medal bout. Errrgggghhhh! All I wanted to do was eat dinner (I was still working through the table when the concession stand closed). At 11:43 I walked out the door headed to dinner. Fortunately the kitchen was still open, unfortunately it was the kitchen at TGIFridays... O, well it was food. Day 2 - Christine has already published(login required) the results of the CFC members, so I won't recycle them here. I will say that Jon fenced well, and most of the foil I saw was tight, pretty good foil. Watching Peter Zay (of fencePBT.com fame) was a thing of beauty (as he once told me, "that's what happens when you wear PBT gear.") I think the best part of the day was being done early and getting to the pool/spa as well as Texas BBQ. Day 3 - Where am I? What is this thing we're doing here? One would think that these questions wouldn't be asked until much later, but after 2 LATE nights (I fould out that Sunday night went considerably later than Saturday), the referees were absolutely exhausted. Hell, I was tired just looking at them. I started the day with Division 1-A Men's Foil. This was the first time I have seen foil above the Div 2 level (as the referee). It is definitely a big change from everything done previous. I must say that even with the wonky fencers in my pool, I did a pretty good job. The only complaint came from a coach, who I'm told can't see action. After that round of pools, I sat until asked by one of the FOC (Fencing Officals Commission, the people who hire and assign referees at National tournaments) what I was doing. When I replied "Nothing." I was sent to Cadet Women's Foil. Which, I followed through to the round of 8. The only amusing thing to come out of that was one coach (a National coach from Fencer's Club in NYC) told me I made the same mistake 3 times in one bout. When I mentioned this to a couple of other coaches they thought it was great. At least then a fencer can adapt and change. Here's this little lesson: Watch what the referee is calling and as long as he is consistent, you know what to expect. Even if he isn't seeing your favorite action, you'll know that when it's your turn to fence. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 6/25/2003 08:55:00 AM ----- BODY: This weekend begins US Fencing's Summer National Championships. I'll be there to both referee and coach. The last two have been grueling, but very enjoyable affairs overall. I hope to provide updates while I'm there, but I'm not sure if internet access will be easy to come by (I know dial-up is available, but that would also require me to sign on to some dial-up service). All depends on the room I get from looking at the hotel website. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 6/25/2003 08:49:00 AM ----- BODY: Can you pass an 8th grade exam from 1895? (via Geekpress) -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 6/05/2003 01:07:00 PM ----- BODY: Diana pointed me to this picture on fencersquarterly.com. (You might want to open it in a new window for handy reference.) Now, looking at said picture, we see a dark, fuzzy image. On it's surface, the bruises/welts look quite heinous. "Look at the marks, that's terrible. Flicks should be outlawed. Immediately, and any touch scored with a flick shuld be annuled!" Or, that's the response we're supposed to have. My response is actually one of annoyance. The flick has been widely used in International competition in foil since 1988. A relatively short time in the span of fencing, for sure, but plenty long enough for everyone to learn how to use and teach the flick. (Yes, I know a great many people don't know how to teach it, but that's their own problem, resources exist EVERYWHERE to learn.) Going back to image, the caption reads "This woman fencer bears the proof of what the flick really is - a brutal slap delivered with bruising force. It is manifestly clear that these are not evidence of "Point" attacks, as the rules of foil fencing stipulate. These were plaque (flat) hits, delivered with a whipping motion that caused each to overshoot its mark and land in an off-target area. Is this the fencing we want the world to see? Is this the sport of honor and self-control?" 1) The image is too dark and fuzzy to be very convincing of the nature of the "bruises". If you want to show people bruising caused by a hit, show it in vibrant, Kodak color. Put those bruises out there for the world to see in the context of the sport. 2) The bruises are on the LEG. I'm hoping it's the front leg, but without context, we can't be sure. The foil target is the torso. How did those bruises get there? Very tall fencer against a very short opponent? Perhaps the weapon was Epee or Saber. If the point managed to "overshoot its mark", there would have to a HUGE disparity in size somehow. 3) The "rules of fencing" do not stipulate anything in regards to the delivery of the point. In foil and epee, touches are scored with the point, the flick delivers the point with a flex of the blade. The point is depressed causing a touch to be scored. What can we learn from this photo and caption? Flick = bad, point = good. Modern fencing = bad, Classical fencing = good. After seeing this I might just have to browse through more of the site to see what else is written. If I have the stomach for it, I might even review a few of them. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 5/18/2003 07:16:00 PM ----- BODY:XSeed Rocks!Yes, yes it does. The Mixed Foil D and Y-14 Foil events today ran quite smoothly and quickly. A good portion of that was due to good nature of the competitors. Very few problems, everyone was there to fence and not cause problems. Another portion of the day's success is owed to the USFA's software. XSeed helped with the difficult parts of seeding pools and the printing of the pool sheets saved loads of time. Kudos to everyone who was there early to help out and stayed late to clean up. Thanks, without you the event would not have been able to happen. It is because of the dedication of fencers that little events like this take place. I'd also like to mention that most of the D Foil event was self-directed, and while there were a few calls I didn't like, the level of refereeing was equal to the level of fencing. I was pleased. In the Northeast many events were self-directed right up to the divisional opens and Senior Championships. The reason it worked was mainly because so many people were knowledgeable about action and trusted each other to make the right calls. Just from the few events I've attended here in Illinois, I've noticed a complete lack of trust between clubs and fencers. (I suspect much of that has to do with a former fencing club, but that's just speculation.) I'd hope that the fencers from outside CFC will go back to their clubs and talk of the positive experience where people didn't jump on each other for every little thing. Perhaps that will help get more fencers for the next event. 15 entries today, can we hope for 25 in the fall? -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 5/11/2003 09:14:00 PM ----- BODY: Sitemeter is a useful little tool. Not only does it tell you how many people are looking at your site, it also lets you know where they're coming from and how they found you. So, to the army.mil visitor: Thank you. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 5/06/2003 03:20:00 PM ----- BODY: Here's a 404 page to bookmark. (Hat tip: LGF) -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 5/02/2003 09:49:00 PM ----- BODY: If you haven't already seen it, check out this car ad. No CGI, none. (via Greekpress) -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 5/02/2003 07:33:00 PM ----- BODY: I've started reading Day by Day. It's good fun, and I recommend it. Never read it at all? Start at the beginning. By the end of lunch, you'll be caught up. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 5/02/2003 07:30:00 PM ----- BODY: Chicago Fencing Club has spiffy new website. If you're a member of the club, go check it out, sign up, discuss. If you're not a member of the club, why not? -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 4/28/2003 09:11:00 PM ----- BODY: Now that I've had a day to mull the clinic over, I have to say that the results were mixed. Many things could have been executed clearer, and I could have been a better in my introduction/opening remarks (I'll attribute it to the unexpected attendance and first-time jitters). I'd say that we also tried to do too much in the short time allowed. On the plus side, it gave people a starting point to analyze action. Next time I'll limit the attendance to about 8 so that everyone in the room has a good view and have them last between 4-6 hours (with a break in the middle). Two hours really wasn't enough time to cover even half of what we got through. We didn't even talk about Attaque au fer or Pris de fer actions (and those are usually the most confusing, right-of-way-wise). -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 4/22/2003 12:41:00 PM ----- BODY: The Right-of-Way clinic is shaping up to be quite a time. The registration is effectively full, with 10 people already signed up. However with only 2 hours, the curriculum is going to have to be slimmed down a tad bit. I had wanted to cover lots of actions offensively, defensively and counteroffense, but time being what it is I'll cut it down to the essentials. That's really the key to fencing (and most things in this world), the fundamentals of actions. I could spend days showing every action I can think of, but sometime, somewhere, someone will know of one that I missed. This happens a lot at tournaments. The best thing to do is to break it down and look at it a piece at a time and try to figure it out from there. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 4/15/2003 11:35:00 PM ----- BODY: I've posted a notice on the CFC Yahoo group of my planned Right-of-Way clinic. For anyone who hasn't seen that message, it's here. Couple more notes regarding it. You won't need any fencing gear and the list is restricted to 10, maaaaaaaaybe 12. There are 3 on the list already. Don't miss out. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 4/15/2003 11:25:00 PM ----- BODY:TaxesLast week as I was finishing up my taxes, I remembered why I'd been paying someone to do them for me. A friend sent along this message (best spoken in Marvin the Martian voice): "oh Blast these taxes! This is torture! This is a strange weapon you earthlings have....and so I shall have to destroy earth...." Dave Barry's reform proposal is worth consideration:Here's my proposal, which is based on the TV show Survivor: We put the entire Congress on an island. All the food on this island is locked inside a vault, which can be opened only by an ordinary American taxpayer named Bob. Every day, the congresspersons are given a section of the Tax Code, which they must rewrite so that Bob can understand it. If he can, he lets them eat that day; if he can't, he doesn't. Or, he can give them food either way. It doesn't matter. The main thing is, we never let them off the island.(thanks to Noodlefood) -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 4/13/2003 11:15:00 PM ----- BODY: Rules, VIIIAh, Epee. Yes, now we move on past foil and the silly Right-of-Way to a more, practical weapon...PART 3. EPEE THE CONVENTIONS OF FENCING A. METHOD OF MAKING A TOUCH t.61 The épée is a thrusting weapon only. Attacks with this weapon are therefore made with the point, and with the point only. Pushing or letting the point of the electric weapon drag on the electric strip is forbidden during the actual bout (between ‘Fence’ and ‘Halt’). Straightening the weapon on the strip at any time is also forbidden. Any breaking of this rule will be penalized according to Articles t.114, t.116, t.120. B. THE TARGET t.62 At épée the target includes the whole of the fencer’s body including his clothing and equipment. Thus any point which arrives counts as a touch whatever part of the body (trunk, limbs or head), the clothing or the equipment it touches (see Figure 5, p. 26). C. CORPS A CORPS AND FLÈCHE ATTACKS t.63 At épée a fencer who either by a flèche attack or by advancing vigorously brings about a corps à corps even several times in succession (without brutality or violence) does not transgress the basic conventions of fencing and commits no fault thereby (cf. t.20, t.25). A fencer who intentionally causes corps à corps to avoid being touched or who jostles the opponent is penalized according to Articles t.114, t.116, t.120. The ‘flèche ending systematically in a corps à corps’ referred to in this article must not be confused with the ‘flèche resulting in a shock which jostles the opponent’ which is considered as an act of intentional brutality at all three weapons and is punished as such (cf. t.87, t.120). On the other hand the ‘flèche which is made by running, even going past the opponent’, and without a corps à corps is not forbidden: the Referee should not call ‘Halt’ too soon, in order not to annul a possible riposte; if, when making such a running flèche without touching the opponent, the fencer who makes the flèche crosses the lateral boundaries of the strip, he or she must be punished as laid down in Article t.28. D. JUDGING OF TOUCHES IN EPEE t.64 Epée competitions are judged with an electrical recording apparatus. When both competitors are touched, and the apparatus registers both these touches as valid, there is a double touch, that is to say a touch is scored for each competitor. 1. Basic principle t.65 Only the indications of the electrical recording apparatus can be taken into consideration for judging the materiality of touches. In no circumstances can the Referee declare a competitor to be touched unless the touch has been properly registered by the apparatus (except as provided for in Articles o.17 and o.24 or when a penalty touch has been awarded). 2. The annulment of touches t.66 1. In arriving at his judgement, the Referee will disregard touches which are registered as a result of actions: — started before the word ‘Fence’ or after the word ‘Halt’ (cf. t.18); — caused by the meeting of the points of the épées or by a touch made on the ground; — or which are made on any object other than the opponent, including his equipment (cf. t.36, t.67/e). Any competitor who intentionally causes the apparatus to register a touch by placing his point on any surface other than that of the opponent, will be penalized as specified in Articles t.114, t.116, t.120. t.67 2. The Referee must take note of possible failures of the electrical equipment and must annul the last touch registered in the following circumstances: (a) If a touch made on the guard of the competitor against whom the touch was registered or on the conductive strip causes the apparatus to register a touch; (b) If a touch properly made by the competitor against whom the touch was registered does not cause the apparatus to register a touch; (c) If the apparatus fortuitously registers a touch on the side of the competitor against whom the touch was registered, for example, after a beat on the blade, by any movements of the opponent, or as a result of any cause other than a properly made touch; (d) If the registering of a touch made by the competitor against whom the touch was registered is annulled by a subsequent touch made by the opponent. (e) Special cases — If a double touch is registered and one touch is valid and the other is not valid (such as a touch made on some surface other than on the opponent (cf. t.66) or a touch made after leaving the strip (cf. t.26ss), only the valid touch is scored. — If a double touch is registered by an established touch and a doubtful touch the fencer who has made the established touch may choose to accept the double touch or ask to have it annulled. t.68 3. The Referee must also apply the following rules regarding the annulment of touches: (a) Only the last touch which precedes the establishment of the failure of the apparatus may be annulled and then only if it is the competitor against whom the touch was registered who is placed at a disadvantage by the failure. (b) The failure must be determined by tests made immediately after the bout was stopped, under the supervision of the Referee and without changing anything whatever of the equipment in use. (c) With these tests, one is trying only to establish whether there is material possibility of a mistake in the judgement as a result of a fault. The location of this fault in the electrical equipment, including that of either of the fencers, is unimportant in reaching a decision. (d) A competitor who makes any modification in, or changes his equipment without being asked by the Referee to do so, before a judgement is pronounced, loses the right to the annulment of the touch (cf. t.35/d). Similarly after again coming on guard and after the bout has effectively recommenced a competitor cannot claim the annulment of a touch before the said recommencement of the bout. (e) It is not necessary, in order to justify the annulment of a touch, that the failure found should repeat itself each time a test is made, but it is essential that the fault should be established by the Referee without the possibility of doubt at least once. (f) If the incidents mentioned in Article t.67 occur as a result of the competitor’s bodycord being unplugged (either near the hand or at the back of the fencer), they cannot justify the annulment of the touch registered. However, if the safety device prescribed by Article m.55/4 is missing or not functioning, the touch should be annulled if the plug at the fencers’ back has become unplugged. (g) The fact that the épée of a competitor has large or small areas of insulation formed by oxidation, by glue, paint or any other material on the guard, on the blade or elsewhere, on which the opponent’s touches can cause a touch to be signalled, or that the electric tip is badly fixed to the end of the blade so that it can be unscrewed or tightened by hand, cannot justify the annulment of touches registered against that competitor. (h) When a competitor against whom a touch has been registered has broken his blade, the touch must be annulled unless the breaking of the blade has occurred clearly after the touch has been registered. (i) If a competitor tears the conductive strip by a touch made on the ground and, at the same time, the apparatus registers a touch against the opponent, the touch must be annulled. (j) Whenever, owing to some accidental cause, tests cannot be made, the touch must be considered as doubtful and must be annulled (but cf. t.67/e). (k) The Referee must pay particular attention to touches which are not registered or which are registered abnormally. Should such defects be repeated, the Referee must ask the members of the Committee for Electrical Apparatus and Equipment present or an expert technician on duty to verify that the equipment conforms to the Rules. The Referee must ensure that nothing is altered either in the competitor’s equipment or in the whole of the electrical apparatus before the expert makes the check. t.69 4. The Referee must supervise the condition of the conductive strip; the bout must not commence or continue if the conductive strip has holes in it which might affect the proper registering of touches or cause accidents. (The organizers must make the necessary arrangements to ensure the rapid repair or replacement of the conductive strips.)I find it quite interesting that the majority of rules regarding epee are rules specifying when touches are annulled, not awarded. There is also, one rule of epee that you will not find in the rulebook. It is: "When refereeing epee, there are two rules: 1. Know the rulebook (and be ready to quote from it), and 2. Stay AWAKE." -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 4/13/2003 10:58:00 PM ----- BODY: Went to the Discovery Center to fence today. What can I say? It's a small community center that sponsors a fairly sucessful fencing program run by the coach of the Chicago Fencing Club. The Disco Center (or simply DC, if you're really feeling like abbr. things) has also in the past served as a sort of "feeder" program for the Broadway Armory, the main meeting place for CFC. The room is small, tight, it actually reminded me of the studio I first learned to fence in at the University of Maine, Augusta. The fencers there are crowded in, Diana tells me that on average 15 people come to her 6 week class. I wonder how she can teach that many in a space like that. But then, teaching 15-20 people alone is quite intimidating. My largest group has been 12, and that was my first teaching experience under the auspices of the Downeast School of Fencing. The fencers there varied greatly, and it's obvious that despite the circumstances and environs, every effort is given to those who are willing to receive it. That is, the crux of the matter, really. My experience with CFC has been that because Diana is one and the students are many, she obviously can not get to everyone all the time. So, people who've been in and around fencing (regardless of actual accomplishments) decide to "help out". The result, a lot of poor advice given (or advice given for the profit of the advice-giver) to new, impressionable fencers. Then, someone (like me) walks through the door and everyone (or the top dogs) in the club have to try them out. I went through this when I first started going to the Armory, after a month or so, very few people would actually seek me out to fence. Those are the people who are still there, learning. In most clubs, there will be a group of people who stick together, they're not there to learn and improve. They're there because they "enjoy the game", and are usually the ones who despite constant losses in nearly every bout (except against the beginners who know 2 or 3 things) feel they are most qualified to dispense tips to the beginners. I have a real problem with this attitude. As a professional, I've spent a few years learning and training how to train fencers (and admittedly have a long way to go still), these people who've been fencing a few months/years yet refuse to learn more than what they did in their first 6-8 weeks of beginners classes, need to pour themselves a big cup of Sit Down and Shut Up. Okay, I'm done for now. For now. As this is a continuing issue. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 4/07/2003 09:25:00 PM ----- BODY: Blogger's been on fthe fritz lately,but it's back for now and so am I. Some news to report: a Right-of-Way clinic is in the development for the end of April to coincide with a couple of weeks of practice time before the Foil D in Evanston. Not much to say about it at this point, it's still being planned. What I do know is that it will be at the Discovery Center and that space is limited. I'll be posting more information about it both here and on the Chicago Fencing Club Yahoo group, chicago_escrime. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/21/2003 11:09:00 PM ----- BODY: Rules, VIINow we begin to analyze how the referee determines the priority of an action. In foil and saber this is the primary responsibility of the referee, and the the consistency (and correctness) of the actions called is generally accepted to be the standard by which referees are judged.III. VALIDITY OR PRIORITY OF THE TOUCH 1. Preface t.55 The Referee alone decides as to the validity or the priority of the touch by applying the following basic rules which are the conventions applicable to foil fencing. 2. Respect of the fencing phrase t.56 (a) Every attack, that is every initial offensive action, which is correctly executed must be parried or completely avoided and the phrase must be followed through — that is to say, coordinated (cf. t.7). In order to judge the correctness of an attack the following points must be considered: 1. The simple attack, direct or indirect (cf. t.8), is correctly executed when the extending of the arm, the point threatening the valid target, precedes the initiation of the lunge or the flèche.Note the word "extending". Meaning that the attacker's hand must have started forward before the lunge (or fleche), not be completely extended in order for the attack to be correct. 2. The compound attack (cf. t.8) is correctly executed when the arm is extending in the presentation of the first feint, with the point threatening the valid target, and the arm is not bent during the successive actions of the attack and the initiation of the lunge or the flèche.Meaning that the attack is correct as long as the arm (hand/weapon) is not withdrawn from its forward motion. 4. Actions, simple or compound, steps or feints which are executed with a bent arm, are not considered as attacks but as preparations, laying themselves open to the initiation of the offensive or defensive/offensive action of the opponent (cf. t.8). To judge the priority of an attack when analyzing the fencing phrase, it should be noted that: 5. If the attack is initiated when the opponent is not ‘point in line’ (cf. t.10), it may be executed either with a direct thrust, or by a disengage, or by a cutover, or may even be preceded by a beat or successful feints obliging the opponent to parry.This clause lays the foundation that an attack remains an attack as long as it is a continuous foward motion. 6. If the attack is initiated when the opponent is ‘point in line’ (cf. t.10), the attacker must, first, deflect the opponent’s blade. Referees must ensure that a mere contact of the blades is not considered as sufficient to deflect the opponent’s blade (cf. t.60/2a). 7. If the attacker, when attempting to deflect the opponent’s blade, fails to find it (dérobement), the right of attack passes to the opponent. 8. Continuous steps forward, with the legs crossing one another, constitute a preparation and on this preparation any simple attack has priority.8 is a good reason to not use forward crossovers while in distance. t.57 (b) The parry gives the right to riposte: the simple riposte may be direct or indirect, but to annul any subsequent action by the attacker, it must be executed immediately, without indecision or delay. t.58 (c) When a compound attack is made, if the opponent finds the blade during one of the feints, he or she has the right to riposte. t.59 (d) When compound attacks are made, the opponent has the right to stop hit; but to be valid the stop hit must precede the conclusion of the attack by an interval of fencing time; that is to say that the stop hit must arrive before the attacker has begun the final movement of the attack.The parry claims right of way from the attacker. A counterattack (stop hit) also has priority, but only if it starts while the attacker is still in preparation. 3. Judging of touches t.60 In applying these basic conventions of foil fencing, the Referee should judge as follows. When during a phrase, both fencers are touch simultaneously, there is either a simultaneous action or a double touch. The first of these conditions is due to simultaneous conception and execution of an attack by both fencers; in this case the touches exchanged are annulled for both fencers even if one of them has been touched off the target. The double touch, on the other hand, is the result of a faulty action on the part of one of the fencers. Therefore, when there is not a period of fencing time between the touches: 1. Only the fencer who is attacked is counted as touched: (a) If the fencer makes a stop hit on the opponent’s simple attack. (b) If, instead of parrying, the fencer attempts to avoid the touch and does not succeed in so doing. (c) If, after making a successful parry, the fencer makes a momentary pause which gives the opponent the right to renew the attack (redoublement, remise or reprise). (d) If, during a compound attack, the fencer makes a stop hit without being in time. (e) If, having ‘point in line’ (cf. t.10) and being subjected to a beat or a taking of the blade (prise de fer) which deflects his blade, the fencer attacks or places the point in line again instead of parrying a direct thrust made by the opponent.Those are the conditions under which an attack is sucessful. These are the conditions under which it is unsucessful: 2. Only the fencer who attacks is counted as touched: (a) If the fencer initiates his attack when the opponent has point in line (cf. t.10) without deflecting the opponent’s weapon. Referees must ensure that a mere grazing of the blades is not considered as sufficient to deflect the opponent’s blade. (b) If the fencer attempts to find the blade, does not succeed (is the object of a dérobement) and continues the attack. (c) If, during a compound attack, the opponent finds the blade, but the fencer continues the attack and the opponent ripostes immediately. (d) If, during a compound attack, the fencer makes a momentary pause, during which time the opponent makes a stop hit, while the fencer continues the attack. (e) If, during a compound attack, the fencer is stop hit in time before beginning the final movement. (f) If the fencer makes a touch by a remise, redoublement or reprise when the original attack has been parried and the opponent has made a riposte which is immediate, simple, and executed in one period of fencing time without withdrawing the arm. 3. The Referee must replace the competitors on guard each time that there is a double touch and he or she is unable to judge clearly on which side the fault lies. One of the most difficult cases to judge arises when a stop hit is made and there is doubt as to whether it was made sufficiently in time in relation to the final movement of a compound attack. Generally, in such cases, the double touch occurs through the fault of both fencers concerned, which justifies the Referee replacing them on guard. (The fault of the attacker consists of indecision, slowness of execution or the making of feints which are not sufficiently effective. The fault of the defender lies in delay or slowness in making the stop hit.)Well that sums up the rules for Foil. Next up is the rules of Epee. As an aside, one occasionally hears the term "mal parry" to describe a parry that does not sufficiently defend oneself from an attack. This is a "coaches" term, not one used (properly) by referees. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/12/2003 05:33:00 PM ----- BODY: Foil RulesOkay, this is the 3rd attempt at posting these rules. Each previous attempt was thwarted (foiled? I'm sorry, couldn't resist that bit of "humor") by blogger.PART 2. FOIL THE CONVENTIONS OF FENCING A. METHOD OF MAKING A TOUCH t.46 The foil is a thrusting weapon only. Offensive actions with this weapon are made therefore with the point and with the point only. Pushing or letting drag the point of the electric weapon on the electric strip is forbidden during the actual bout (between ‘Fence’ and ‘Halt’). Straightening the weapon on the strip at any time is also forbidden. In foil it is forbidden, during the course of fencing, to advance the shoulder of the non-sword arm in front of the shoulder of the swordarm (cf. t.36). Any touch scored by the fencer at fault while committing this offence will be annulled. Any breaking of these rules will be punished according to Articles t.114, t.116, t.120.This rule assumes that the "strip" is made of copper (or another grounded material, copper being the most plentiful) and thus the placing the point on the strip and straightening the weapon will damage the strip, making parts of it no longer grounded. As a matter of good habit, don't straighten your weapon on the strip, regardless of the material it's set on. B. TARGET 1. Limitation of the target t.47 In foil, only touches which arrive on the target are counted as valid. The target in foil excludes the limbs and the head. It is confined to the trunk, the upper limit being the collar up to 6 cm above the prominences of the collar bones; at the sides to the seams of the sleeves, which should cross the head of the humerus; and the lower limit following a horizontal line across the back joining the tops of the hip bones, thence by straight lines to the junction of the lines of the groin (see Figure 4, p. 20). 2. Touches off the target t.48 A touch which is made on a part of the body other than the target (whether directly or as a result of a parry) is not counted as a valid touch, but it stops the phrase and therefore annuls all touches which are scored thereafter (but cf. t.49). 3. Extension of the valid target t.49 However, touches which arrive off the target are counted as valid whenever, by reason of an abnormal position, the fencer has substituted this non-valid target for the valid target. The Referee may question the judges about this, but he or she alone must decide whether the touch is valid or not.Yes, when you cover target, your opponent not only gets the touch that he would have scored, but you get a penalty, potentially leading to yet another touch being awarded to your opponent. C. JUDGING OF TOUCHES IN FOIL t.50 Foil competitions are judged with an electrical recording apparatus. I. MATERIALITY OF THE TOUCH t.51 Only the indications of the recording apparatus can be taken into consideration for judging the materiality of touches. Under no circumstances can the Referee declare a competitor to be touched unless the touch has been properly registered by the apparatus (except as provided for in Articles t.49, o.17, o.24, or when a penalty touch has been awarded). t.52 When using the apparatus it should be noted that: (a) If a non-valid touch has been scored the apparatus will not register a possible valid touch scored on the same side of the apparatus. (b) The apparatus does not indicate whether there is any priority in time between two or more touches which it registers simultaneously.The referee can not decide to award a touch the machine does not register, even if the referee saw the blade bend and a "valid" touch clearly land. You can not hit off-target first and then carry on to hit on target and get a touch. Some older machines (I think Prieur is one of them) allow for both the colored (valid) and white (off-target) lights to be on at the same time. The result is an off-target. Most machines in use do not allow this to happen. Also, it is for the referee to determine Right of Way, it does not matter which "light came on first", it matters who has priority. II. ANNULMENT OF A TOUCH t.53 1. The Referee will disregard touches which are registered as a result of actions: — started before the word ‘Fence’ or after the word ‘Halt’ (cf. t.18); — which are made on any object other than the opponent or his equipment (cf. t.41). A competitor who, intentionally, causes the apparatus to register a touch by placing his point on the ground or on any surface other than that of the opponent will be penalized as specified in Articles t.114, t.116, t.120. Fencers are forbidden to place a non-insulated part of their weapon in contact with their conductive jacket with the intention of jamming the electrical apparatus and thus avoiding being touched. The penalty for committing such an offence is specified in Articles t.114, t.116, t.120. Any touch scored by the fencer at fault is annulled. t.54 2. The Referee must, on the other hand, take into account possible failures of the electrical equipment, in particular: (a) He or she must annul a touch which has just been awarded as a result of a valid touch signalled on the apparatus (colored lamp) if it has been established, by tests made under the referee's personal supervision, before the bout has effectively recommenced and without any of the equipment in use having been changed (cf. t.35/d): — either that a touch registered as ‘valid’ against the competitor against whom the touch has been awarded can be made without there being in fact a valid touch; — or that a ‘non-valid’ touch made by the fencer against whom the touch was awarded is not registered by the apparatus; — or that a ‘valid’ touch made by the fencer against whom the touch was awarded does not cause any touch either valid or non-valid to be registered; — or that the registration of touches made by the competitor against whom the touch was awarded does not remain recorded on the apparatus.The point of this is to only award touches if both fencers are mechanically able to turn on the lights, regardless of who has Right of Way. (b) On the other hand, when the Referee has decided that a touch made by a competitor has priority, this touch shall not be annulled if subsequently it is found that a valid touch made by the opponent is registered as non-valid or that the weapon of the fencer against whom the touch was awarded is permanently registering a non-valid touch. (c) If a fencer’s equipment does not conform to the provisions of Articles m.27 and m.28, a touch made off the target which is registered by the apparatus as valid will not be annulled. 3. The Referee must also apply the following rules: (a) Only the last touch made before the fault was established can be annulled. (b) A competitor who makes any modification in or who changes equipment without being asked by the Referee to do so, before the Referee has given his decision, loses all right to the annulment of the touch (cf. t.35/d). (c) If the bout has effectively recommenced a competitor cannot claim the annulment of a touch before the said recommencement of the bout.I interrupt here to emphasize that only the last touch can be annulled and that if you ask for a test that leads to a fault found (as it is the fencer's perogative to test whenever you wish), don't do the test yourself. Don't touch anything, point the weapon at the ref and ask him/her to test it for you. (d) The precise location of a fault found in the equipment (including the equipment of the competitors) is of no importance for this possible annulment. (e) It is not necessary that the failure found should repeat itself each time a test is made; but it is essential that the fault should be manifested to the Referee without the possibility of doubt at least once during the tests made by him or under his supervision. (f) When a competitor against whom a touch has been registered has broken the blade, the touch must be annulled unless the breaking of the blade has occurred clearly after the touch has been registered. (g) The Referee must pay particular attention to touches which are not registered or which are registered abnormally. Should such defects be repeated, the Referee must ask a member of the Committee for Electrical Apparatus and Equipment or an expert technician on duty to verify that the equipment conforms to the Rules. The Referee must ensure that nothing is altered in the competitor’s equipment or in the whole of the electrical apparatus before the expert carries out his check. 4. Whenever accidental causes make it impossible to carry out tests, the touch will be considered doubtful and annulled. 5. If touches are registered simultaneously on both sides of the apparatus, and the Referee cannot establish the priority with certainty, the competitors must be placed on guard. 6. In accordance with the general rules (cf. t.18) the Referee must stop the bout, even if no touch is registered by the apparatus, whenever fencing becomes confused and he or she is no longer able to analyze the phrase. 7. The Referee must supervise the condition of the conductive strip; the bout must not commence or continue if the conductive strip has holes in it which might affect the proper registering of touches or cause accidents. (The organizers must make the necessary arrangements to ensure the rapid repair or replacement of the conductive strips.)Next are the rules concerning who has Right of Way and how it is determined. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/10/2003 09:51:00 PM ----- BODY: RoTD, VNow we find out what happens when your equipment doesn't conform to the rules.6. Nonregulation equipment t.45 In whatever circumstances a fencer on the strip is found to be in possession of equipment which is nonregulation or defective, this equipment will be immediately confiscated and submitted to the experts on duty for examination. The equipment in question will only be returned to the owner after the measures necessitated by this examination have been completed and, if appropriate, after the payment of any expenses for repairs. The equipment must be rechecked before it is used again. 1. If a fencer appears on the strip: — with only one regulation weapon conforming with the Rules (cf. t.86); or — with only one regulation bodycord; or — with a weapon or a bodycord which does not work or which does not conform with the Rules; or — without wearing a protective under-plastron (cf. t.43 above); or — with a conductive jacket which does not fully cover the valid target; or — with clothing which does not conform with the Rules; the Referee will apply the penalties according to Articles t.114, t.116, t.120 (first group). 2. When during a bout an irregularity is found in the equipment which could be caused by conditions during the bout: Examples: — conductive jacket with holes in which touches are registered as nonvalid, — weapon or bodycord no longer functioning, — pressure of the spring in the point too weak, — the travel in the point no longer regulation, the Referee will apply neither warnings nor sanctions. On the contrary, any touch made with the equipment which has become defective will be awarded.The key part of this is to have TWO (2) weapons and cords AT the strip. Not one there and the other one in your bag on the other side of the room. Also, make sure your socks fully cover your legs, even in saber. Part 2 specifies that faults that occur during the bout are not penalized. 3. If, when a fencer appears on the strip or during a bout, it is established that the equipment used by the fencer: (a) does not bear the marks applied at the preliminary inspection, the Referee will: — annul the last touch, if any, scored by the fencer at fault; — penalize as specified in Articles t.114, t.117, t.120. (b) does not conform to the rules in a way not covered by the preliminary inspection, the Referee will: — penalize as specified in Articles t.114, t.116, t.120. (c) has been passed by the preliminary inspection but presents irregularities which could have been made deliberately; or (d) bears the marks of the preliminary inspection which have been imitated or transferred; or (e) has been altered in any way to allow the recording of touches or the nonfunctioning of the apparatus at will; then, in cases (c), (d) and (e), the Referee must immediately confiscate the equipment (weapon, bodycord and if necessary the conductive jacket), and have it examined by the expert on duty. After having obtained the opinion of the expert (a member of the Committee for Electrical Apparatus and Equipment at the fencing events at the Olympic Games and at World Championships), who has established the facts (cf. m.33ss), the Referee will apply the following sanctions, without prejudice to the application of Article t.96d; — in cases (c) and (d) the Referee will penalize the fencer as specified in Articles t.114, t.118, t.120. — in the case of (e) the Referee will penalize the fencer as specified in Articles t.114, t.119, t.120, and annul the last touch, if any, scored by the fencer at fault. While awaiting the decision of the Referee that bout will be suspended but the other bouts in the pool may continue.Part 3 lists the penalties for not having valid inspection marks. Showing up at the beginning of a bout earns you a warning. Making your own, earns an expulsion. Tomorrow starts with the Foil-specific rules. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/10/2003 04:42:00 PM ----- BODY: Ahhh, the horrorKing Crimson is playing March 14 & 15 at Park West. The problem? That's the weekend I'll be spending in Arlington, TX for the NAC Div II/III/Veterans tournament. While ref'ing at the NAC is always a good time, I'll sure miss the KC show. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/10/2003 04:38:00 PM ----- BODY:Saber is where it's atUS Fencing is reporting that Keeth Smart has moved up to #1 on the world points list AND Sada Jacobson is now #2 on the Women's Saber list. This is the highest ranking ever for an American Senior Woman fencer. -------- AUTHOR: Clint DATE: 3/04/2003 03:55:00 PM ----- BODY:RoTD, IVContinuing where we left off discussing referees:t.38 (b) Team competitions The delegates of the Refereeing Committee and the Bout Committee will choose referees who seem to them competent from among the neutral A and B Grade referees present, and lots will be drawn among these referees. 2. World Cup Competitions t.39 The Bout Committee, assisted for finals by the Official Observer of the FIE, applies the rules described in Articles t.37 and t.38, above. 4. Method of judging touches (a) Materiality of the touch t.40 The materiality of the touch is established according to the indications of the apparatus, and when necessary by consulting the judges (cf. t.36). Only the indications of the electrical apparatus as indicated by its own lamps or by the extension lamps can be taken into consideration for judging touches. Under no circumstances can the referee declare a competitor to be touched unless the touch has been properly registered by the apparatus (except as provided for in Articles t.49, o.17, o.24 or when a penalty touch has been awarded).EH? A referee can't award a touch unless the machine registers one. Simple? Except for the cited articles, the referee can't say "well, I saw you touch eventhough the machine didn't 'go off', so I'm awarding a touch." Again, a situation I see from time to time (once is too many). If it ever occurs to you, protest immediately. t.41 On the other hand, the Referee should, in the cases enumerated for each weapon, annul a touch registered by the apparatus (cf. t.53ss, t.66ss, t.73). (b) Validity or priority of the touch t.42 As soon as the bout has stopped, the Referee briefly analyzes the actions that compose the final phrase d'armes. For finals, the Referee may make use of a television monitor to check decisions should he or she be uncertain. After reaching his decision regarding the materiality of a touch, the Referee, by applying the rules, decides to which fencer a touch is to be awarded, whether both are touched (épée) or if there is no valid touch (cf. t.55ss, t.64ss, t.74ss). The Referee would use the following gestures (see Figure 3, p. 16).Meaning that there are times that a touch MAY occur which the referee deems to be invalid and annuls it (I'll be discussing them as they are described). The meat of t.42 is the instruction to use hand signals (which are shown in the rulebook, and I'm certainly willing to help people out with them). While they may look silly, they help EVERYONE in the room decipher the referee's call. 5. Regulation equipment and checking of equipment by the Referee t.43 Before the start of each pool, team match or bout by direct elimination, the Referee must assemble all the competitors on the strip and verify that: — in all weapons, the FIE guarantee label is present on the fencers’ equipment (clothing, masks). (See USFA Note below.) — in electric foil, the conductive jacket conforms to the provision of Article m.28 when each competitor is standing upright, is on guard and is in the lunge position; — in épée, the material from which the clothing is made has not too smooth a surface, and the competitor is wearing a jacket conforming to the regulations; — in saber, the conductive jacket conforms to the provision of Article m.34 when each competitor is standing upright, is on guard and is in the lunge position; — in all three weapons, each fencer is wearing, under his jacket, a regulation protective under-plastron, made of cloth which can resist 800 Newtons. For bouts in the direct elimination and the finals at the World Champi-onships and the Olympic Games, and for finals of World Cup competi-tions, the two fencers in each bout will go to the material testing zone, located near the strip, 30 minutes before they are due on the strip. Their equipment will be tested under the responsibility of the SEMI (or the designated expert for finals of World Cup competitions). If any anomaly is identified the equipment at fault will be changed at once, without any penalty being applied. The SEMI delegate will hand over the bodycords, the masks and the weapons that have been tested to the Referee for the bout. Ten minutes before they are due on the strip the fencers will report to the Referee designated for their bout. The Referee will hand over a bodycord to each of the fencers in the access zone for the strip. The Referee will check that the fencers are wearing regulation under-jacket protection. The Referee and the fencers must stay togetherin the access zone until they go on the strip. One minute before they go on the strip the Referee will give a weapon to each fencer, to plug in the bodycord. No test will be carried out on the strip prior to the bout. Competition organizers must organize a waiting area where the fencers can warm-up during this checking procedure.The majority of this does not directly apply to USFA tournaments, even those at the Div I National level. The important thing is that your jacket (and lame, if applicable) cover your hip bones and overlap your knickers by 10cm when in the lunge position. t.44 In addition to the checks mentioned below, the Referee of a bout may at any time, on his or her own initiative or at the request of a fencer or of a team captain, carry out such checks, or verify the checks already carried out or even carry out, or have carried out, new checks. The Referee will in any case, before each bout, ensure that the control mark is present on the clothing, the blade and the mask of each fencer, and that the insulation of the wires inside the guard and the pressure of the spring in the point of electric foils and épées conform with the Rules. Checking the insulation of the wires and the pressure of the spring will be repeated each time a weapon is changed. In épée the Referee will check the total travel and the residual travel of the point: — The total travel will be checked by inserting a gauge measuring 1.5 mm between the barrel of the point and the tip. This gauge, provided by the Organizing Committee, may have a tolerance of ± 0.05 mm, i.e. from 1.45 mm to 1.55 mm. — The residual travel will be checked by inserting a gauge measuring 0.5 mm between the barrel of the point and the tip. The apparatus should not register when the point is depressed. This gauge, provided by the Organizing Committee, may have a tolerance of ±0.05 mm, i.e. from 0.45 mm to 0.55 mm. For details of the weight used for the check, see Part 1, Chapter 1 of the Material Rules. At the beginning of the bout the Referee will place the reserve equipment that has been checked near the appropriate end of the strip for the fencer concerned. USFA Note: In all three weapons, each fencer's last name must be printed legibly by hand or machine in dark blue capital letters not more than 10 cm high: either (1) on the back of the uniform or lame between the shoulders; (2) on the front or side of the thigh of the "rear" leg; or (3) on a piece of fabric or lame material that is firmly sewn to the uniform in such a way that it will not detach during fencing or catch the opponent's point. Fabric attached to the uniform must be the same color as the part of the uniform to which it is attached. Conductive materials must be attached in such a way as to not alter the conductivity of the metallic vest or jacket. NAMES PRINTED ON TAPE ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. The use of an FIE homologated uniform is not required for USFA competitions. However: The protective plastron must: 1 have at least two layers; 2. include a sleeve down to the elbow without opening or seam in the region of the armpit; and 3. ensure the best possible protection. It may be fixed to the jacket without being entirely sewn in 4. it does not need to be constructed of 800 Newton material.Again, the emphasis is on the that that referee must a new weapon presented by a fencer during the bout and yes, you have to have a plastron and a jacket, even if your jacket is FIE rated at 800 Newton material. Tomorrow we talk about what happens when your equipment is non-conforming. Yippee.... -------- |
|
||||
|
|
|||||